all of these devices pay for their core products/specialties… which honestly seems to be more software based. they are made by other companies with wyze branding and little tweaks. just like they arent a vacuum company, they arent a lamp company, they arent a robot vacuum company, etc. they are not a watch or wearables company now. all make smart watches / fitness trackers, etc. If you want a device that integrates with your phone completely, one with more refined software, a wider array of more accurate sensors to give more accurate results for numerous specific things (sleep, exercise, activity, etc.), better quality materials that are less likely to be scratched when exposed to surfaces or objects harder than they are… then wow, you just found out why samsung, apple, google, etc. not sure why because youre in an office environment scratches arent supposed to be possible… Yes, an office environment will scratch the screen… you know why? even in office environments there are hard, and sharp surfaces. it doesnt have GPS or other more advanced sensors to check against multiple times for accuracy. Yes, your watch will translate some arm movements as steps… like early fitness trackers did. If t he info in the app isnt accurate and upadated, your watch wont be accurate and updated… if it doesnt have constant access at will to the app, and the app to your phone, its not going to work right. it doesnt have to have all of its own sensors, processors, memory, storage, etc. Your watch gets most of its info from your phone… thats why it was so cheap. Yeah, i know your _ has it, and its changed your life and all that… its amazing what the power of suggestion and acceptance does isnt it? so again, why would you think they could be? they still cant… they can give you vague estimates based on averages, expectations, and hope… but none of them can be accurate. why would you think it would?Įven with that… if sleep tracking is vital to you… how is a wrist worn device going to be accurate? measuring REM? really? with accelerometers, gyroscopes, heart rate, blood ox, etc. yeah the software could obviously be better if they had programmers spend a few more months on it… what software wouldnt be? and how much would a few more months of tweaking the software cost? and your list of complaints at that point would still be huge… Its a basic, entry “smart” watch that performs as a basic entry “smart” watch… no, its not a polished 3rd or 4th gen device made by a company that is devoted to fitness trackers/smart wearables. Yeah, the sensors are as basic as cost will allow. Its a $20 watch, sold by a camera company that sells rebranded products… honestly WTF are you expecting? I dont understand the people complaining that it cant differentiate between laying in bed watching TV/playing on their phone, and sleeping… how can it?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |